Cyber Conning – or Cyber Silliness?

Filed under: Risk,Security,Strategy — lenand @ 7:24 am

Half a billion is a lot to me – and anybody with the time to read this blog.  Have we been conned that it is worth that much to increase levels of cyber protection? @StewartRoom alerted me to this article from the Guardian web site: How do we counter cyber attack? That’s the £500m question

Is it enough? The apparently US government spends between $6bn and $7bn annually for unclassified cyber-security work and about the same on the classified part.

One view is that we are being conned by the “military-industrial complex”.  Another is that we need it to engage in threats of mutual cyber destruction – like nuclear deterrence.

The problem is that we are involved in asymmetric warfare, and the cost of attacking is currently so much less than the cost of defending.  What we need is, lower cost defences.


1 Comment »

  1. […] More of Leanard’s articles, opinions and outpourings on Governance matters – No2UID for ID Schemes; CapGemini Commission Questions; Identity Fallacy – No2UID; GB SIF supplier shines in US Cloud; SIF Strikes back; EC Scuppers Software Strategy; Cabinet Office Conceals Concepts; 50million Voter Id Cards?; DfE Dithers, SIF Suffers; Cyber Conning – or Cyber Silliness? […]

    Pingback by Channel shift resources; Presentations and slides for 2010 Contact Ctre & Customer Services Forum; John’s blow for debutants careers; Storm in a tweetcup and much, much more…. : PSFBuzz — 17/11/2010 @ 6:14 pm | Reply

RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Blog at WordPress.com.

%d bloggers like this: