It is more than a year since Liam Maxwell’s “Better for Less” was published. What has been achieved from the 69 pages of ideas? It obviously made the right impression because he is now working in the Cabinet Office in a one year appointment from September 2011
He did ask “WHAT WILL SUCCESS LOOK LIKE?
Our goal should be to deliver to the online population frontline public services with minimal, possibly zero, administrative cost, freeing up cash for more effective, intermediary-based, service delivery for those not online, and also as savings. This is already happening in some areas of local government and driving taxes down. It is happening in other countries, making service delivery better. It is time the biggest component of the British economy, its bloated state, started to learn these lessons.
How does it work? 5 principles underlining all IT in government We base our approach on a small number of core principles
1) Openness
a. Open Data – government data must be transparent
b. Open Source works – its concepts should be applied to processes as much as to IT
c. Open Standards will drive interoperability, save money and prevent vendor lock-in
d. Open Markets – competition creates efficient market-based solutions.
2) Localism – the centre may set the standards, but local deployment is best.
3) Ownership and Privacy
a. It’s our data, government can have access but not control over personal data.
b. Government should be accountable for data protection and proper use.
4) Outcomes matter more than targets.
5) Government must be in control of its programmes, not led by them.”
Let’s look to see how successfully the principles have been incorporated into the Government ICT Strategy.
1. Open data, open standards and open source are clearly stated objectives. And open markets are part of the procurement objective.
2. Localism does not get a mention, according to word search. This is a gaping hole, but perhaps Liam will explain this when he speaks at the SOCITM conference in November.
3. Alarmingly, neither privacy nor data protection are words within the strategy. The objective for “Risk Management Regime” has implied elements for both, but the metrics concentrate system security – not anything based on citizen data protection.
4. Outcomes are potentially the most important gap in the strategy. There’s too much concentration on internal, central government processes. The four objectives for “using ICT to enable and deliver change” are not really focussed on citizen outcomes.
5. Governance of programmes is an implicit role for the “Public Expenditure (Efficiency and Reform) Cabinet sub-committee (PEX(ER))“. There are twelve senior people named, with representatives from MOD, MOJ, HMRC, HO, DoH, DWP and Cabinet Office. That should be enough people. However, Quarkside thinks that UK plc should also have representation from departments with responsibility for improving the ICT skill base of the country. Shouldn’t DfE and BIS have something useful to contribute? And if localism is really important, why doesn’t DCLG have a place on the high table?
Quarkside gives “Better for Less” 40 marks out of a possible 100 for influencing the agenda. In the old days, this was a ‘Pass’ at A level. So not too bad. However, it would not have secured you a place in one of the top universities.